?

Log in

No account? Create an account
 
  mcity
 
08-Mar-2011 @ 10:25 pm
  http://www.indifferenceproductions.com/

Let's see; hard to use frontpage, "Images" page that can't easily be altered or added to...
 
     
 
AHHHH!!! 
  fotoman311
 
04-Oct-2010 @ 7:08 pm
  Run! To Georgia! To get your interiors decorated by Marge.

www.bettybowers.com/marge.html

Edit:  Was a little bit sad to see that the Betty Bowers site is a parody.  en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Landover_Baptist_Church
 
     
 
it's the trifecta, really 
  sleary
 
22-Feb-2010 @ 3:25 pm
  There are a lot of sites with bad rainbow text and random waterfall photographs... but how many of them are narrated by really skeevy men?

(Auto-playing video warning.)
 
     
 
Wow. 
  anagramofbrat
 
12-Feb-2010 @ 2:55 pm
  Need a wedding dress? how about a cookie recipe? Conspiracy theory?

For best results, turn up the sound.
 
     
 
 
  fotoman311
 
02-Dec-2009 @ 1:55 pm
  With instant setup websites and easy to use CMS's becoming more and more common, I'm finding the real bad gems are fewer and further between. Today I came across http://www.cinemas4me.com.

Wow.
 
     
 
o_O 
  moar_caffeine
 
21-Oct-2009 @ 11:44 am
  Words don't even begin to describe...  
     
 
 
  mcity
 
02-Oct-2009 @ 11:28 pm
  http://www.tentonhammer.com/features/mittani

I'd like to know who thought basically giving blog posts splash pages was a good idea.
 
     
 
Worst author website ever? 
  sleary
 
11-May-2009 @ 9:53 am
  http://laurellkhamilton.org/

I know what the titles of the books are, and I still can't make them out.
 
     
 
Seed Magazine 
  moopet
 
12-Mar-2009 @ 7:15 pm
  I'm slightly confused by this one. http://seedmagazine.com gets a lot of things right. But how long does it take to notice that there's a navigation column on the left? In honest-to-god #ccc on #fff text. With the vertical viewing angle on my monitor I can't even see it unless I'm at eye level.

The most baffling part though - and I hope someone else can shed light on this - is the banner ad at the top. When I wanted to check how the site displayed in another browser, I was surprised to find that then that banner is adblocked, suddenly it becomes a whole world of navigation previously unseen. I don't understand.

Anyway, the colour problem was mainly why I wanted to bring it up. I was going to contact them to make the suggestion that they should change to a friendlier colour scheme, but none of their contact email addresses are suitable. Probably on purpose.
 
     
 
Oh My - I wonder if this was on purpose? 
  indifferenthues
 
26-Feb-2009 @ 5:56 pm
 
mood: confused
http://www.havenworks.com/

I'm afraid I'm unable to figure out what this site is actually for. But it certainly is umm . . . colourful.
 
     
 
 
  mcity
 
12-Feb-2009 @ 12:43 pm
  http://www.dark-nation.com/lulu/

Yes, that's right, five low-contrast, tiny text iframes. Nested in tables. Whut.
 
     
 
Bottled water 
  okaree
 
10-Feb-2009 @ 1:40 pm
  How is an industry association on the wrong end of public opinion defending its interests?

Not with its website, that's fer sure.

Interestingly, the inner-page layout is fudged in FF and IE... but not in Chrome.

 
     
 
Hello 
  thatssoillegal
 
09-Jan-2009 @ 2:20 pm
  I just discovered this community, unfortunately I wish I would have found it earlier because at my school we were trying to find bad sites to redesign. So now I'll share with you my mega find....

probably the worst site/layout/concept EVER!
http://www.cel-ebration.com
 
     
 
 
  mcity
 
29-Oct-2008 @ 8:50 pm
  http://www.gasmasks.net/
So let me get this straight; the site was last updated last year, and it still advises against using anything other than IE? And dozens of needless tables too, lovely. Did this guy ever learn what a DIV is?
 
     
 
 
  mcity
 
17-Jul-2008 @ 12:43 am
  http://kkk.bz/

The official website of the Knights Party.
 
     
 
 
  ellinoora
 
13-Feb-2008 @ 2:19 pm
  I really like the content of this website, but the only way to get things is read it on there. No pdf's... and oh, the colours and the moving stuff! My eyes hurt now...  
     
 
Horrible e-commerce skin #23527623473 
  obisotray
 
31-Jan-2008 @ 1:28 pm
 
mood: cranky
OH HAY GUISE MY NEPHEW IS TOADALLY A WEBDESIGNOR AND WILL MAEK IT U TEH TEMPLATES FER CHEEPS!
http://www.faintingroom.com/catalog/

nevermind the shitty products and probably misleading images, check out the fonts and the crowding on this doozie!  Maybe this very inexperienced person is also a TIME TRAVELLER sent from yon ancient days when making 700x700 fixed layouts was the sensible thing to do.  ARRRGHGASHGRSHGASD
 
     
 
Screw Web 2.0. I come bringing Web 0.5 beta! 
  reckless_mess
 
18-Jan-2008 @ 5:27 pm
  Well, I'm certainly not having fun yet.*

*Okay, I lied. I'm having fun laughing at how kitsch it is. :( And the fact that those YouTube videos look very, very anachronic there.
 
     
 
 
  mcity
 
21-Nov-2007 @ 12:19 am
  http://www.gotee.com/
I'm fairly certain that three splash pages=fail. Please fire your web designer, Christian music label gotee.
 
     
 
 
  mcity
 
14-Nov-2007 @ 11:42 pm
  http://www.coreinsight.org/TheQuest.html
There is nothing on that site that is not full of fail.